The 40m dipole was replaced shortly after the damage. It’s made of the same type of 12 m poles from Spiderbeam. But now there is only a dipole for 40 inside made of copperweld wire.
I recently found it was only 20 kohm between center conductor and screen. So probably water in a connexion. The coax was taken down and loss was measured to 1.3 dBs on 7 MHz on the 40m length as compared to 0.68 dBs of a new coax. The old line had been outside in the sun and rain for 50 years. It was first used in the sixties with the 4 el Quad which is depicted above. So can’t complain. It’s now replaced with a brand new RG-213.
The propagation experiments still going on. 40m to New Zealand and 20 to the US.
A pick from the measurements (click on the image):
The project of finding out the relationship between A-index and propagation continues. It all started since I tought the attenuation stayed long after the A-index had fallen.
This morning when trying 40m the SWR was very high. When looking outside I saw the tip of the 40m dipole had fallen off. The reason for the damage was the connection of the inner and outer part of the actual antenna inside of the pole. The inner part is a 450 ohm ladder line and the outer part is a conductor from a military telephone cable. There was a knot that obviously had weared on the inside of the pole when it had flexed in the wind and weakened it.
A comparison with the help of Reverse Beacon spots revealed that the Inv vee is inferior to the dipole over the whole of Europe . Even in the direction of the dipole’s ends. Only places the inv vee is better is on short range like SM3 and ES (8 dBs in SM3 and 5 dBs in ES). But in the rest of Europe the rotatable dipole is on average 3,3 dBs better taken as a mean of 26 spots. Is half of the power going straight up?
Today I found the 40 m dipole was broken. The 10 m Spiderpole on one side was off about 2.5 meters from the tip and was hanging in the wire element. So in hours or days it will come down. Still functioning though. I put up an inverted vee dipole with top at 20m and with broadside to ZL, to be able to continue the 40 m transmissions to trace 40 m LP and SP signals to ZL1 while A index varies. The inverted Vee was about 5 dBs weaker than the dipole!
10 days of tracing WSPR signals (please click on the image):
Still trying to find the connection between the A-indices and propagation by transmitting and looking at a remote receiver in New Zealand. The result is not very convincing as can be seen here:
So I’m now collecting data from 20m WSPR signals from North America instead.
Still very good propagation on lower bands due to the quiet sun.
Click on the image:
Very good propagation today also.
Worked ZL1ALA on 30 in the morning among others. Also a good opening to JA on 20m.
In the afternoon 9M0W was booming on 80. About 20 dBs stronger than yesterday:
Worked them on 160m at 1648Z, 8 minutes after our SS when the signal peaked.
Looking at the k-indices doesn’t explain why the propagation was so much better today:
Still good propagation on lower bands.
Worked 9M0W on 40 and 80 with good signals. Also XR0YD on Easter Island and FK8IK on 40 among others.
I’ve started to make a comparison between porpagation and k indices:
(Click on the image)
See also in the propagation menue
Signal I ZL1 -90dBm at 0645z on 40m. About same as usual when good propagation.
Was using my rotary dipole at 21 m and 1 kW.
At the same time DK9PY was -75 dBm or 25 dBs stronger. I have never been that strong.
ZL1 SS at 0649 and SM SR at 0519z
The numbers: SSN:0 SFI:68 A:12 K:4
Back from a skiing vacation.
Lower bands are very good with a quiet sun.
The numbers: SSN:0 SFI:68 A:6 K:1
Today QSO with Mark ZL3AB in Christchurch on 40 m just before his sunrise. Mark is using 100W and an inverted L antenna.
In the afternoon around my SS at 1620z I had a QSO with Rakesh, VU2RAK on 40m. He was using 200W and a G5RV antenna.
There was an email from Dirk PY2UDB in São Paulo.
He says in February 22nd (excerpt from the email):
What I have noticed that about 1.5 to 1 hour before sunset (between 21:15 and 21:45 UTC), the signals coming from Europe (on 40 mtr) start to peak and getting through with less interference (QRN). But only certain geographical locations. Sweden, Lithuania, Ukraine and some Russian states at a distance of about 11.000 Km. Stations nearer have much lower signal levels or even are not hearable. I receive RST’s of 419 to 519. The stations I receive from RST 579-599
After sunset, signals from the nearer locations (6000-10.000 Km) start to appear, but not as strong as the initial period and with much more QRN.
What I also notice that the same effect happens at sunrise, in south to westerly direction (for me New Zealand , Japan) and that my signal reports are much stronger, but the DX-stations much weaker even if they use high-power. I receive RST’s from 539 to 559. the DX-stations are coming in with RST 419-539 ……….
PY2UDB, São Paulo
Good propagation today. QSO with Drew, VK3XU in Melbourne on 40m. He was using his HB setup with 100 W and a dipole.
QSO with the Bouvet guys (3G9A/MM) heading for Cape Town.
Good signals on 7027 kHz:
Opening to the US West Coast was much worse than yesterday with signals way down. But got a recording from Don, W6QW:
Good opening to US West coast on 40m. Signals coming both over SP and LP. Worked W6QW:
I was listening on the 110 m long NW Beverage since there was severe echo when listeningen on the dipole.
Today I performed measurements on a set up corresponding to the beverage hub out in the woods. I’ve been concerned about signals picked up by the 4 meter long ground lead which runs from the hub down to the ground stakes. On 40 and 30 there is really not much difference if a beverage wire is connected or not. The reason seems to be stray capacitance on the hot side of the isolating transformer. If a wire of a few dm of length is connected to the hot side of the transformer it’s enough. Even a short between hot and cold side (ground) of the transformer made of 5 dm of wire would give full signal into the receiver from a single wire connected to the hot side. This could be cured by using screened wiring from the hot end of the transformer to the switching relays. Something for coming summer.
Worked (among others) W6QW on 40 at 1545 UTC. He reported hearing me over both SP and LP. He is using an interesting 2 el low loop antenna. Check it out on QRZ.COM.
Was on 80m this morning. Worked V47UR who was a solid S9 here. Found he was much stronger on my inv vee with broadside to SW than on my other inv vee dipole broadsided to NW. The difference was 1-2 S-units or a bit over 6 dBs. The direction to him is due West or 270 dgs. Checked my Reverese Beacon spots from NA East coast and they were almost an S-unit better on the other inv vee dipole which is intended for NA. Seems to be a sharp lobe division due West.
Back after a week in Puerto de la Cruz, Tenerife and activities as EA8/SM0BRF.
A good morning for low bands. Good signals on 160, 80 and 40m.
Worked AA7G (Gert SM5LWC) in NY, KY7M in AZ and KB1EFS in MA on 160m about half an hour before our sunrise. Reverse Beacon spots showed it was a bit late but still OK. Best reception varied between the SW and the NW beverages. I suppose the reason was changing polarisation of the incoming wave. The SW Bev has big side lobes sensitive to horizontal polarisation and VOA CAP suggest a wave angle of 38 dgs.
There were callers I couldn’t copy due to a new rattle on 160m.
Also worked K2BG and K2QBN on 80.
Went to 40 and worked JH1THE, Ken. He called over LP and was S7 with flutter. He later turned to SP and became a solid S9. He is using a 2 el Yagi.
Today the QRM from the horse fences reached unprecedented levels with clicks hitting the S9 mark. Horses got loose last night because of fireworks, so today all fences seem to be set at highest possible voltage.
Recording when listening on the NE terminated bev on 80 m: